Lieff Cabraser Home | Sitemap | Search

 
Lieff Cabraser Securities banner
right shadow graphic
 
right shadow graphic
graphic: top of page body area
logo

Press Release

Lieff Cabraser Announces the Filing of Motion to Amend the Complaint in the Merrill Lynch Mutual Fund Lawsuit Against McKesson HBOC for Securities Fraud to Name and Add Claims Against WebMD

September 5, 2003

The national plaintiffs' law firm Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, announced that yesterday it filed a motion to amend the complaint in an accounting and securities fraud lawsuit against McKesson HBOC, Inc.; its predecessor HBOC; Arthur Anderson, LLP; and certain individual defendants. The proposed amended complaint names WebMD as a defendant and adds allegations regarding the company's conduct. Lieff Cabraser serves as counsel for plaintiffs Merrill Lynch Fundamental Growth Fund, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Global Value Fund, Inc. ("Merrill Lynch Funds"). The motion was filed in California Superior Court.

The Merrill Lynch Funds charge that a massive accounting fraud occurred at HBOC before and following its 1999 acquisition by McKesson Corporation. The Merrill Lynch Funds allege that defendants artificially inflated the price of securities of McKesson HBOC, the name McKesson adopted after acquiring HBOC, as a result of improperly recognizing revenues and making false and misleading representations and omissions concerning the financial condition of HBOC. Once the fraudulent conduct of defendants was discovered and disclosed, the value of McKesson HBOC's shares fell sharply, causing significant losses to the Merrill Lynch Funds.

Yesterday, the Merrill Lynch Funds filed a motion to add WebMD as a defendant. The new allegations against WebMD consist of the following: WebMD agreed to enter into transactions which (a) allowed HBOC to improperly record $5 million in "revenue" for the quarter ending December 31, 1998 on a transaction that amounted to little more than an exchange of inventory; (b) permitted HBOC to record that revenue in the quarter ending December 31, 1998 even though the transaction was not completed nor even entered into as of that date; and (c) allowed McKesson HBOC to improperly record $9 million in "revenue" from a contract that was subject to undisclosed "options" which rendered the contract terms undeterminable, for the quarter ending March 31, 1999, all in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP).

Source / Contact

Richard M. Heimann, Esq.
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000

   
 

Submit Your Case

Lieff Cabraser represents investors nationwide in securities and investor fraud lawsuits. Click here to submit your case or report corporate wrongdoing.

Noteworthy Cases

> In re Broadcom Corp. Derivative Litigation

> In re Brooks Automation, Inc. Securities Litigation

> In re Cablevision Systems Corp. Derivative Litigation

> Qwest Communications International, Inc. Direct Litigation

> Tyco International Direct Litigation

Recent Successes

> Alaska v. AOL/Time Warner

> Merrill Lynch Funds v. McKesson

News

February 11, 2008: Richard Heimann comments in the Los Angeles Times on recent trends in securities fraud litigation...

April 2007: Richard M. Heimann participates in securities litigation round table for California Lawyer magazine...

   
color bar
Firm Logo
 

Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

 
Lief Cabraser Securities home page link